For this page, all I have to offer right now is an introduction to some of the books that have given me some theory and examples of community organizing as well as others that have influenced my thinking on social issues in general. (There are more on the My Journey-Challenges and Learnings pages) Most of my learning about community organizing happened in the national and local training events and actually doing the work.  If you only read one book - read the first one mentioned below by Mike Gecan.


Gecan, M. (2002).  Going public. Boston: Beacon Press.

         This is one of the clearest books about community organizing that I have read.  It briefly covers the history of Alinsky-style tactics and the origins of the Industrial Areas Foundation.  Interspersed with very exciting real-life battles in the public arena, it succinctly outlines the rationale and techniques behind this decades-old, but relatively little known style of restoring democracy and accountability to local communities.  Gecan covers the principles of mutual accountability, relational culture and leadership development, public actions and reflection and evaluation.  It is a quick and interesting read with concrete examples of how and why this form of community organizing works and would make anyone want to join up with an IAF affiliate immediately upon reading.


Alinsky, S. (1946).  Reveille for radicals.  New York:  Random House.

         This bible for “radicals” ignites a fiery call to pragmatic action by explaining what it takes to be a radical versus a “liberal” and presenting observations on the radicals’ place in historical revolutions.  Alinsky stresses that everyone must understand the relationship between themselves and the community they live in order to get them involved in its changes and lifelong survival.  He speaks about the moral decline of our society and the inner conflict that can only be corrected with a focus on spiritual values rather than material goods.  He describes the building of a people’s organization – the concepts, the tools, the pitfalls, and the tactics.  Of importance to the adult education community is the section on popular education – to achieve an unspoken understanding – “create a climate in which people want to learn because learning itself is essential to life.”

 

Alinsky, S. (1971). Rules for radicals: A pragmatic primer for realistic radicals.  New York: Random House.

         In his second book, community organizing guru Saul Alinsky refines his original rules for radicals seeking to change the power structures of U.S. society.  I enjoyed this book much more than “Reveille” – it was more accessible in its language and as noted in the title, it was pragmatic.  There are interesting stories of how the rules of revolution were applied by famous figures such as the founding fathers of the United States and Gandhi in India.    The best chapter answers the question “Does this particular end justify this particular means?” listing 11 rules regarding the ethics of ends and means.  If you have ever felt in your life’s history that you were right and “they” were wrong, this is a good chapter to revisit your certainties.  He redefines such over-used words as power, self-interest and compromise and spends a lot of time on the importance of communication.  There is also a chapter on tactics, but it seems every situation is unique, so it serves as only an example of what is possible.


Chambers E. T. with Cowan M. (2003). Roots for radicals:  Organizing for power, action and justice.  New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group. 

 “While the silent majority goes along with the status quo, it only takes a well-organized 2 to 3 percent of the body politic to initiate social change.”  This is one of the insightful and energizing quotes from the third book about community organizing begun by Industrial Areas Foundation founder, Saul Alinsky.  This book describes the newer vision of community organizing including real life stories and riveting examples of power in play.  Some of the concepts covered include:  the relational meeting as a foundational tool of the organizer, the meaning and purpose of broad-based organizing, creating social capital, private versus public relationships, public actions provide organizational oxygen, and power precedes program.  “Big Ed” Chambers, as named by Studs Terkel in the foreword, is the successor of Saul Alinsky as the head of the Industrial Areas Foundation since his death in 1972.  His own stories of organizing give an updated view of the principles in action as it can work in today’s world.


Warren, M. (2001). Dry bones rattling:  Community building to revitalize American democracy.  Princeton, NJ:  Princeton University Press.

Mark Warren recounts the multi-year effort to rebuild social capital through community organizing in the San Antonio and southwest Texas area.  Using and then updating Industrial Areas Foundation techniques to achieve long lasting results, he offers good reasons as well as his trial and error successes to make his case.  Through examples and strong stories, he covers topics such as multiracial collaboration, reasons for working through established community groups and leaders and the essential but often overlooked topic of intentional and ongoing leadership development.  It is IAF principles in concrete and a strong case for embedding your particular issue within the overall needs of a community for productive and long-lasting results.  This I believe has strong implications for the adult literacy field to position themselves as part of the community’s issues rather than a separate and single crisis. (not sure about this anymore)


Reardon, K. (2000). An experiential approach to creating an effective community-university partnership: The East St. Louis action research project. Cityscape: A journal of policy development and research. 5(1), 59-74.

          This is one of the first articles given to me that got me interested in a kind of research that would bring together adult education and community organizing in a way that would make a difference in my community.  It describes a ten year process of change between a university urban planning department and several poor neighborhoods in East. St. Louis during the 1990’s.  Because of systematic and critical reflection of the process by all parties involved, the researchers changed their approach through the years, moving from the professional-expert model to participatory action research to empowerment planning to organizational capacity building.  What I like about this article is that Reardon acknowledges a “well-intentioned but ultimately counterproductive community intervention approach.”  He emphasizes the benefits of systematic reflection and experiential education and reminds us “that intervention in complex social systems is rarely effective without considerable fine-tuning.”


Schorr, L., Sylvester, K., & Dunkle, M. (1999).  Strategies to achieve a common purpose:  Tools for turning good ideas into good policies.  (Special report #12).  Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership.  (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED467663)

 

            This paper was presented at a seminar for education policy makers on tools for improving social policy by overcoming bureaucratic restraints to scaling up small successful programs.  As a follow up to her 1997 book on the same topic, Schorr gives a history and examination of why social programs have mostly failed when going to scale thus far.   Wishful thinking rather than hardheaded analysis has led to the phenomena of political credit for categorical funding of programs and demonstration programs that do not spread automatically.  Schorr states “I am convinced that the reason we haven’t been able to build upon success on any significant scale is that we have ignored the mismatch between the attributes of effective programs and the gravitational pull of prevailing systems.”  This report lists seven strategies for sustainability, scale-up and replication, and the second author, Dunkle provides tools for implementing each of the strategies.  Although it is geared specifically for early childhood programs, the strategies and tools are very helpful and general enough to be transferable to any social service issue.


Schorr, L. (1997). Common purpose: Strengthening families and neighborhoods to rebuild America. New York: Doubleday


I don't know why I didn't annotate this book - it's one of my early favorites - see the related article and presentation above.

Make a Free Website with Yola.